Extra meetings are always a good thing, but just don't let the membership
of the other meetings slip because of a new meeting elsewhere. That's a
good way to kill an organization; seen it happen in other groups. Everyone
gets spread out over too many small groups, communication drops, and the
whole thing comes crashing down.
BTW, had a good time at the Brandon meeting. Thanks to everyone for all
the help...
James
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul M Foster" <paulf@quillandmouse.com>
To: <slug@nks.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Possible St Pete meetings?
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 10:51:28AM -0500, bpreece1@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > Also it would be a good Idea if you are interested in starting another
SLUG
> > meeting
> > to get with Paul Foster our President, & Ed Centanni to make sure that
you
> > have their seal of approval.
>
> The officers have discussed this from time to time on the Admin list,
> and I think we're agreed that a St Pete meeting place would be a good
> idea. However, we've also pretty much agreed that beyond St Pete, we
> really don't want to add more meeting places; six meetings a month is
> quite enough.
>
> > This will ensure that you are within our guidelines and to insure SLUGS
good
> > name.
> >
>
> We've also had discussions on this. Some points of importance: 1) Select
> a meeting time/date that doesn't interfere with other SLUG meetings. 2)
> Don't do anything we could all be sued for later. ;-} 3) If you need
> personal pointers, contact me offlist.
>
> Paul
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:25:34 EDT