Not sure on how many more M$ systems are needed and that worries me. I think the existing environment is using Windows workstations (win98/xp) and connects to a Netware 3.11 server using a windows only application of some sort. I'm still looking into what's being proposed but it looks like the vendor wants to tie in the existing application from the workstations into an existing MSSQL server. The whole purpose of the application is to queue data when the WAN links go down. This whole thing got dropped on me rather recently and I'm still trying to sort out who told them they could use MSMQ.
Brett
>>> vsingleton@cfl.rr.com 05/09/03 09:34AM >>>
Just curious ...
How many more M$ operating systems will be required to run the software
for your full implimentation of it?
Vernon
Brett Simpson wrote:
>The department that sent out the RFP (Request for Bid) had a company respond with a product that uses MSMQ. In order to reject the Bid we have to come up with some valid reason on why the technology is not feasable.
>
>
>
>>>>awyatt@fewt.com 05/08/03 06:02PM >>>
>>>>
>>>>
>On Thu, 2003-05-08 at 17:40, Brett Simpson wrote:
>
>
>>Does anyone know of any links that lay out all of the downsides to MSMQ? I have a department that's thinking of having a vendor dropping in a solution that uses MSMQ and since it's Microsoft I'm wary. Normally I would say no way but the manager types need something more.
>>
>>http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/technologies/communications/msmq/msmq_qa.asp
>>
>>Brett
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Why MSMQ over MQSeries?
>
>http://www-3.ibm.com/software/integration/wmq/
>
>-Andrew
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:40:04 EDT