RE: [SLUG] a simple harddrive backup scheme

From: Travis B. Creighton (tron@computron-usa.com)
Date: Fri Jul 04 2003 - 14:15:56 EDT


This solution only gives you a backup against a drive failure and not
data corruption. It is only half the solution.

If you are limited to 2 drives, I'd do the mirror but set aside space
for a daily (m-w-f & t-th-s) or a daily & weekly backup. This gives you
a day (w/ m-w-f & t-th-s) or a week (w/ daily & weekly) to detect file
corruption or virus/trojan problems.

Ideally, you mirror 2 drives and do the historical to a 3rd and keep a
daily (at least m-w-f & t-th-s), weekly, and monthly backup.

With the mirror for fault tolerance and historical backup for
corruption, you are well covered.

Just MHO,
Travis

-----Original Message-----
From: slug@lists.nks.net [mailto:slug@lists.nks.net] On Behalf Of Eric
Jahn
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 10:51 AM
To: SLUG
Subject: Re: [SLUG] a simple harddrive backup scheme

"From a hardware aspect two same sized drives both bootable is the
cheapest
> most convenient form of operation, with built a in recovery option."

the above sounds like the simplest, lowest maintenance solution to me.
so when my old original drive crashes, just switch to boot from the
newer drive. I supposed I would have to initially do a complete disk
copy from the old to the new, then just update the files I need saved
(home directory) regularly. I guess I would also need to check now and
again the verify that the new backup disk is still even bootable as I
keep adding files (boot which aren't system files, just data file in
/home). Of course if lightning strikes, I'm up $*!t creek, but chances
are I'll be sitting at the computer at that time also, so no worries. ;)

On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 03:34, Ronald KA4INM Youvan wrote:
> From a hardware aspect two same sized drives both bootable is the
> cheapest most convenient form of operation, with built a in recovery
> option.
>
>
> > If I want to become responsible and start backing up my data on a
> > daily basis, what's the simplest, lowest maintenance way to go? I'm

> > thinking a cron job that runs a bash script which copies specified
> > folders to the other drive. Does this sound like a path of least
> > resistance? Is there good free open source software that can manage

> > this for me?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:40:45 EDT