Unfortunately there's a difference between this and Enron: Enron hid most of
the involved assets; SCO made it plain in SEC filings what they were doing
(that appears to be where ComputerWorld got their information from). So, it's
all perfectly legal.
It's also noted that Vultus was majority-owned by Canopy Group, which also has
a major stake in SCO. Holding companies have no qualms about shuffling
around assets (the AECOM engineering conglomerate is a good example).
On Monday 28 July 2003 07:01 pm, you wrote:
> On Monday 28 July 2003 18:51, Frank Roberts - SOTL wrote:
> > Why isn't the SEC investigating?
> >
> > This has all the appearance of Enron stile fraud.
> >
> > http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0,10801,83452,
> >00 .html
>
> I just checked any anyone can file a complaint woith the SEC at:
>
> http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:00:55 EDT