-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In my reading of the story, I get the idea that SCO isn't telling us who
exactly stole the offending code. If the changelog is as detailed as Linus
has said, SCO should sue the person(s) who put the offending code into the
kernel. Additionally, they wouldn't need to have people sign an NDA, as they
could point at the people who stole the code, and show how those people got
the code in the first place.
Russell
On Thursday 07 August 2003 08:42 am, Pete S. wrote:
> http://www.gcn.com/vol1_no1/tech-infrastructure/23047-1.html
>
> SCO = M$?
> Am I missing something here? SCO is not helping the Linux world.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
> Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
> posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
> official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
- --
Linux -- the OS for the Renaissance Man
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE/Mlu0AqKGrvVshJQRAvAYAJ9/i22fv+CDgmAyT8Qqbb6GjLxwcQCfVKyj
PQK2PQXxhDw8dEn0edrS2PI=
=sx+I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:13:37 EDT