[SLUG] The Evolution of Computing

From: Joey Dale (joey.dale@elkenserver.net)
Date: Sat Mar 06 2004 - 21:34:30 EST


  did not write this!!!
My mentor, Angus Berry, which is also the one who got me to try Linux.
>
> The Evolution of Computing by Angus Berry (copyright 2003)
>
> Foreword:
> Through studying the past, we can get an idea of the path that evolution
may
> take in the future.
>
>
> The first computer operating system to stand on their own two feet are
> rarely seen today, except in the IT fossil record. Some of these early
> operating systems moved out of the corporate jungle and into small
business
> in the early 80's (the character period). Although these OSes were the
> precursors to today's modern operating systems they briefly
flourished and
> died out as evolution passed them by, when more robust OSes passed them
by.
>
> These early systems were small and not yet powerful, but they were
> indicators of what was to come. Some bore a striking resemblance to
today's
> modern OS. They developed tools such as Spreadsheets and Word processors
> that enabled them to get useful work done. One OS known as CP/M, had an
> appendage called VisiCalc which was one of the earliest signs of useful
> tools. The advent of new tools gave a fledgling OS an evolutionary 'leg
up'
> allowing these machines to do real work and they began to multiply.
Another
> OS called simply DOS, was able to adapt these tools also allowing it
> compete. Through a combination of cunning marketing, when environmental
> conditions were right, at a time when the PC was cloned, DOS became the
> dominant OS of it's day.
>
> The next leap forward was the advent of the GUI (Graphical User
Interface),
> which initially evolved separately as yet another tool. Other tools were
> quickly ported to run in the GUI and at the same time the ...
>
> The first Linuxapiens appeared at a time when the Windowthaals were well
> entrenched as a successful operating system. The Windowthaal had risen
above
> it's GUI peers such as OS/2 and the Cromiga, when it fully developed it's
> GUI and became known as the Windowthaal.
>
> When Linuxapiens appeared they immediately had great communications
skills
> although lacking the evolved GUI of the Windowthaal.
>
> The Linuxapiens learned to hunt in clusters and this enabled them to take
on
> larger prey than the Windowthaals. Linuxapiens were also more
resistant to
> infection by viruses. They were even able to take on and beat Wooly
> Mainframes.
>
> Linuxapiens quickly adapted to new environments such as
>
> The Windowthaals continued to exist alongside the Linuxapiens and
continued
> to adapt to meet the challenges of the changing IT environment. It
appears
> that although Linuxapiens and Windowthaals communicated and co-existed
they
> never actually interbred. They had once thrived in a closed source
> environment and managed to rise above their OS competitors
>
> Windowthaals with their proprietary nature reproduced more slowly
than the
> Linuxapiens. The Linuxapiens reproduced at an exponential rate due to
free
> interbreeding between groups of similar Linuxapiens who shared common
> software characteristics.
>
> Then, in an evolutionary twist, the business world entered a economic
> ice-age. The Windowthaal struggled to hand on to it's market share, but
the
> leaner and more stable Linuxapiens continued to grow and evolve.
> Windowthaals continued to fall prey to virus and worms, which further
eroded
> their position.
>
> It wasn't all doom and gloom for Windowthaals. There are cases were
> Windowthaals were able to survive attacks when groups of the more robust
> Linuxapiens formed a circle or 'firewall' around the Windowthaals to
protect
> their weaker and distant relatives from virus & worms. However, other
> records show that in many cases the Linuxapiens simple replaced the
> Windowthaals.
>
> One notable exception to this timeline is the Applegaster. This OS was
also
> able to live along side the Windowthaal as an evolutionary anomaly, by
> specializing rather than competing directly with the Windowthaal. It was
> similar to but not directly related. However the Applegaster continued to
> evolve and around the time the Linuxapien began to take over, the
> Applegaster mutated (or interbred) and became OSX which closely resembled
> the Linuxapien allowing the Applegaster to continue to evolve and take
> advantage of the continuing growth and evolution of the Linuxapien.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:04:30 EDT