Re: [SLUG] big numbers

From: Derek Glidden (dglidden@illusionary.com)
Date: Wed Mar 31 2004 - 13:58:04 EST


On Mar 31, 2004, at 12:17 PM, Ronan Heffernan wrote:

> If BASH can not be made to use higher-capacity variable types, you
> could use PERL, Python, C++, etc. (probably not the most welcome of
> answers.)

Since it sounds like string-processing, I'd really recommend rewriting
it in Perl. It would also be a lot easier to follow the program logic
if the language is some sort of formally defined structured language
than with a bunch of weird shell commands.

If it's not terribly complicated, you might even find someone who could
just convert it. It doesn't sound like "analysing calls to phone
numbers" is a particularly complex or complicated program.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
"We all enter this world in the | Support Electronic Freedom
same way: naked; screaming; soaked | http://www.eff.org/
in blood. But if you live your | http://www.anti-dmca.org/
life right, that kind of thing |---------------------------
doesn't have to stop there." -- Dana Gould

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:51:28 EDT