Re: {SPAM?} Re: [SLUG] Re: Linspire aka Lindows now trying to make Apple Mad?

From: Eben King (eben1@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: Sat May 08 2004 - 19:42:25 EDT


On Sat, 8 May 2004, Robert Snyder wrote:

> > "Windows" != "window managers". Yes, "window" and "window manager" are
> > generic terms. But "Windows" as a trademark owned by Microsoft to
> > designate a "graphical user interface based operation system for desktop
> > computers" is not generic. It sounds like you're trying to make the case
> > that Microsoft used this idea of a "window" or "window manager" in
> > coming up with the name "Windows" for their OS. Perhaps. But I can't
> > hold that against them. Were I in their position, I would likely have
> > done the same thing. It's a good marketing/business move. But if you
> > truly think it's just a generic term, you're welcome to test the waters
> > as Lindows did. Maybe you'll have better luck. ;-}
>
> See my point exactly.... But I was reminded of something.... X-Windows uses
> the names Windows in there name

from X(7x):

       The X Consortium requests that the following names be used when refer-
       ring to this software:

                                          X
                                   X Window System
                                    X Version 11
                             X Window System, Version 11
                                         X11

       X Window System is a trademark of X Consortium, Inc.

> but you dont see Microsoft all over them.....

I bet they have significantly shallower pockets than Linspire does.

> There are plently of other software I have seen around wht net with the
> word Windows for the program name describing usually some type of
> themeable hack for some operating system. You dont see MS afterthem.

MS isn't dumb. They know how to pick their battles.

> Why Because not the first one isan Operating System...

Bah. It was called "Windows" when it obviously _wasn't_ an OS. You could
exit it and go back to the _real_ OS, DOS.

> Panther - Apple trade mark
> Jaguar - Another apple trade mark. Yes I know it seems stupid but the US
> government allowed it.

Don't forget "Firewire". Generically, it's IEEE 1394.

-- 
-eben    ebQenW1@EtaRmpTabYayU.rIr.OcoPm    home.tampabay.rr.com/hactar

An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all. -Oscar Wilde

----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 17:59:23 EDT