Re: {SPAM?} Re: [SLUG] {SPAM?} Debian-Sarge - Help

From: Levi Bard (levi@bard.sytes.net)
Date: Sat May 22 2004 - 21:17:49 EDT


>>> But really... Its not that big a deal to me. I compile whatever I
>>> need against
>>> whatever libs the system has installed. They do not need to be replaced
>>> because I'm building from source... not installing prebuilt binaries
>>> compiled
>>> against libs I don't have on the system.
>>>
>>> Automake and autoconf my friend ;-)
>>
>>
>> Some applications require specific versions of libraries. For
>> example, Gnucash (or at least it used to). So, if half the libraries
>> on your system aren't bleeding-edge, then you have to rebuild half the
>> libraries on your system.
>
> Time to debunk so many stupid myths.... Very unusual these days with
> slack to have libaries out of date.....
I'm talking about a machine that runs for a long time and isn't
reinstalled every time a new version of slack is released.

> also with programs like
> Swaret
> Slapt-get
> and the list go on with orginal programs nad variations of Apt-get that
> updateing libaries with Dependency checking easily done. Personally
> Slackware is pretty up to date with it libaries. No it does not use
> unstable beta version unlike other distros I seen ( not necessary debian
> but others)
Yeah, I mentioned those earlier.

> I ran the debian xconfig program by running dpkg whatever still
> notwroking right where I am using exact values that I have always used
> with other distros in virtual pc. very wierd problem I am having with
> it.
Very odd. What shows up if you diff the nonworking one and a working one?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:48:42 EDT