Re: [SLUG] Threaded email software

From: Tevfik Yucek (yucek@eng.usf.edu)
Date: Thu Jun 03 2004 - 13:47:27 EDT


On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 01:46:09AM -0400, Dylan William Hardison wrote:
> Spake Steve on Thursday, June 03, 2004 at 01:16AM -0400:
> > I'm curious how many here have threaded vs non threaded email software.
> >
> > Please answer with name of the software too.
> >
> > This will give a bit more insight into how widespread it is, or even known and
> > or used. It might even be available under typical windows apps too.
> >
> > I use kmail, which needless to say after my posts, does support threads.
>
>
> I use Mutt, which has very good thread support too.
> It also has an break thread function, I can correct my thread-view
> when someone replies to something to start a new topic...
>
> Mutt is text based, too, so I can check my mail remotely via ssh.

I converted to mutt after I've read the following in the mutt.org:

    "All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less."
                                          -- circa 1995

Later, I realize how true was the above sentence.

Tevfik
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:09:30 EDT