On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 12:11:54 -0400, Steve Szmidt <steve@szmidt.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 09 September 2004 07:25 am, Knowles Burrell wrote:
> > >>No corporation with experienced admins allow autoupdate.
> > >
> > >I thought that was one of the big deals about Gentoo and Debian.
> >
> > Are you saying they auto update without having any user interaction? I
> > have used both distro's and currently I am using Gentoo. Neither of
>
> Haha. No, the thread was about ms updates.
>
> I decided to make fun of the all evil ms view, as it's exaggerated. They act
> in a manner which one could easily call evil, but is simply an egotistical
> and highly irresponsible way, for a market leader to be operating.
>
> When I typed "evil overlords" I had a big smile on my face. The point of that
> being that in email, you cannot readily tell what is the emotion of the
> person who wrote it is. And in the very next sentence I backed down from the
> evil description. Written communication can often be read in more than one
> way, and to top it off, people often misread things.
>
> Kind of like that silly ink blob test. Where you're asked to say what you see.
> (And they don't mean ink either. Haha. : )
>
> Back in the early windows vs Mac war there were some very heated discussions
> on the the subject. To me, it was amazing how emotional people could get
> about something like an operating system. It's just a dumb tool with zero
> intelligence.
>
> Of course a tool can be crappy and not at all perform as advertized and That
> can become rather annoying, to say the least. So one can get upset with the
> manufacturer. Especially when they are a court acknowledged monopoly.
>
> The fact that they make more money than many countries, and still have a
> crappy product with EULA's and policies that is only good for them... Well
> let's just say that you don't exactly feel like supporting them in all the
> selfish, nah - destructive ways of operating, which they pursue.
>
> As far as Robert having the right to say what he wants. Well of course he
> does! My comment was initiated by him saying "shut up" to Chris. It seemed
> kinda out of place to be appearing such a staunch defender of windows and
> their ways. Which a number of his emails looks like. I don't care if he is,
> but being a SLUG list, anti ms posts are to be expected and not reasonably
> silenced either.
>
> - --
> Steve
>
> "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
> neither liberty nor safety."
> Benjamin Franklin
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFBQIDNljK16xgETzkRAqk7AJ46S0RpGrAQ1MQ5a/ks16csfq6S2wCgtyw7
> KQicecB2XWj3D1QQ3I79eV0=
> =gnST
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
I said it before and I will say it again steve.
Does windows have way too many issues - yes
Is windows full of security holes and haven for zombie spam machines yes
But should I let people spread bs and that what it is BS about it no
MS had to give you a way of turning it off and it can be down with a
matter of 5 whole clicks. and it so hard having to expect some one to
go to the control panel and turn off automatic updates.
Now if this was osx i would say the say thing. I will not sit around
and let people go off and spread just utter bullshit....
Damn right i told him to shut up just like i would of told him shut up
if i was in the same room as he was.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 17:04:18 EDT