I didn't want to say anything about a month ago because I felt silly, but it
seemed that transition, as you say from GTK+ 1 to GTK+ 2, made it awful. I
noticed it had far more options before their move. I thought I was going
nuts.
Nevertheless, I continued using it; faithfully putting in bookmarks. I'm not
sure about migrating the bookmarks from Galeon to Opera or Firefox. If I was
coming straight from Mozilla, no problem.
/mario
On Thursday 07 October 2004 09:58, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 09:35, Mario Lombardo wrote:
> > Do you mean "spunky" like fast? Konqueror and Netscape both outperform
> > Galeon and Mozilla on my PC. The problem with the previous two is their
> > lack of features and HTML interpretation.
>
> I stopped using Galeon once distros moved to GTK+ 2 (GNOME 2). The
> 1.3.x series is a disappointment and it's just hard for the maintainer
> to keep up with all the changes in Mozilla.
>
> The last, solid Galeon release IMHO was 1.2.x for GTK+ 1. The 1.3.x
> releases have not caught up with its features. And the GTK+ 1 was
> ultra-fast.
>
> I've now switched to Firefox.
>
> I'd love to figure out a way to backport newer Mozilla releases to work
> with GTK+ 1 and re-create Galeon 1.2.x with it, but it would be far too
> much work.
>
> > The only full-featured session-saving browser that has every shown any
> > performance on my system is Opera. They want $$$, and I'm about to
> > spring for it.
>
> If you like it, it's worth the cost.
> If it makes you more productive, it's worth the cost.
>
> We're not talking about putting your data in a Hostageware or even
> Commerceware format.
> We're talking about using a Standardware application.
>
> If it's better than a Freedomware solution, then it might be worth the
> cost if it works better for you.
> That's one reason why I spring the $79 for StarOffice.
>
> > My productivity loss and annoyance level is getting high. :(
>
> Then buy Opera.
>
> > However, I just downloaded from Matthew Hall's repository Galeon
> > 1.3.17.99. We shall see.
>
> With Mozilla a moving target, it was always difficult for Galeon to keep
> up. Unlike Firefox, it relies on the Mozilla binaries at run-time.
>
> Again, I stopped using Galeon after 1.2.x, when the move was made to
> GTK+ 2. I have not seen a number of feature in 1.3.x that were in
> 1.2.x.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:18:10 EDT