On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:39:15 -0400, Levi Bard
<taktaktaktaktaktaktaktaktaktak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hmm. Konqueror and Netscape were dogs on my system compared to Galeon.
> > Galeon had a smaller footprint, according to a chart I saw in one of the
> > Linux magazines many moons ago. I gave Galeon up when I kept being told
> > that development had slowed and would eventually cease. Caveat: I don't
> > run Gnome or KDE. I run XFCE, for what it's worth.
>
> I think the gecko renderer is just a high-memory component - the
> differences between the usages of the different gecko-based browsers
> are in how much stuff they wrap around it. On my old 32m ram machine,
> the only full-featured gui browser I could stand to use was Opera.
> Firephoenixbirdfox was very much heavier, then the various
> bare-bones-gecko-in-a-gtk-frame browsers (like skipstone), then
> mozilla and galeon(which varied between heavier and lighter with each
> version), and finally netscape7.
>
> I didn't list Konqueror because I find it breaks on a lot of sites for me.
>
> Actually a very fast gui browser that works well for most sites is
> links2 http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~clock/twibright/links/
> Supports most javascript, and will even do gui html rendering in cli
> via svgalib.
Galeon and emphany are pretty snappy to me so is firefox gotten
extremely snappy with my vidalinux ( gentoo with gui installer)
because everything is optimized for my processor which seems to make
a difference.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:25:12 EDT