Re: [SLUG] "ports" v. "packages" distributions -- WAS: Galeon, may I have a dog, please?

From: Bryan J. Smith (b.j.smith@ieee.org)
Date: Sun Oct 10 2004 - 16:20:18 EDT


On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 11:23, Dylan Hardison wrote:
> Not to mention debian has source pages

As does RPM (.src.rpm).

> and apt-fu allows one to easilly install things from source,
> even apply patches.

Not sure about the APT-RPM capabilities yet (or YUM) to do the same.
But I have fetched sources and built them before.

> One can also change the compile flags.

As can RPM (from .src.rpm).

It's as I said before. If you build from source, with a "ports" distro
(e.g., Gentoo), you are still at the mercy of the "ports maintainer,"
just like a "packages" distro (e.g., Debian, Fedora) with its "package
maintainer."

"Ports" distros just force building on you. "Packages" distros are
typically installed from binary. But "packages" distros can be quite
optimized -- e.g., Fedora is i486 ISA, i686 optimized with all
extensions supported as by package that uses them.

-- 
Bryan J. Smith                                  b.j.smith@ieee.org 
------------------------------------------------------------------ 
"Communities don't have rights. Only individuals in the community
 have rights. ... That idea of community rights is firmly rooted
 in the 'Communist Manifesto.'" -- Michael Badnarik

----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:30:47 EDT