Mario Lombardo wrote:
> I had to do this for a client once. It was a while back. In the end, we
> decided on IBM's Domino. He doesn't like it nor does he like IBM :( This
> may be a somewhat antiquated, but it's a start. I may have already posted
> this to the list some months ago:
>
> Bynari Insight server
> http://www.bynari.net/
>
> Easygate Workgroup server
> http://www.easygate.de/EasyGate/Home
>
> Novell Groupwise
> http://www.groupwise.com/
>
> IBM's Lotus Domino
> http://www.lotus.com/
>
> Samsung SDS Contact
> http://www.samsungcontact.com/en/
>
> Stalker Communigate Pro 4
> http://www.stalker.com/
>
> SuSE Openexchange Server 4
> http://www.suse.com/us/business/products/openexchange/
>
> Oracle Collaboration Server
> http://otn.oracle.com/products/cs/index.html
>
> Billworkgroup's Exchange4Linux
> http://www.billworkgroup.org/billworkgroup/home
>
> Kroupware Project
> http://www.kroupware.org/
>
> PHPgroupware
> http://www.phpgroupware.org/
>
> ..and don't forget those just mentioned on the list. James Marcinek (SLUG
> member) totally loves www.opengroupware.org. I don't know about the
> egroupware.org.
>
> I would love to hear more of your findings and finally what you decide to go
> with. This kind technology is really exciting. I remember someone on
> (Slashdot or Freshmeat?) complaining how there wasn't any collab server for
> Linux and how how many programmers were coding on a myriad of MP3 players
> when we needed these. Now, take a look!
>
> /mario
>
>
> On Saturday 16 October 2004 10:39, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 2004-10-16 at 09:43, Patrick Grantham wrote:
>>
>>>Rather than avoid setting up a MS box with exchange server for
>>>collaborative functionality in MS outlook, what are some recommended
>>>email server packages for linux? I have studied Open exchange from Suse
>>>and I am sure it's a fine package. Suggestions on an open source
>>>package?
>>>I thought there was a "open source project for this. I can't seem to
>>>find it.
>>
>>There are a lot of "Exchange Replacements" out there, but many are
>>proprietary -- typically at the server storage end. OpenGroupware.ORG
>>(OGo) is the most powerful back-end I've ever seen, supporting
>>everything from Evolution to Palm (i.e., direct access over the network
>>by a Palm device, no desktop needed), while having an open back-end
>>using WebDAV. You'll still need a non-free connector to convert WebDAV
>>to Outlook's proprietary synchronization API, but you have that issue
>>with any "Exchange Replacement."
>>
>>Full discussion:
>>http://lists.leap-cf.org/pipermail/leaplist/2004-March/038122.html
>
Outta curiosity: Do you happen to know if any of the open-source
offerings are taped togethere with Perl?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:55:57 EDT