On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 15:31 -0500, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 12:51, Tyler Vann-Campbell wrote:
> > I read over this, very informative.
>
> Normally one should "CD upgrade" between major version changes -- e.g.,
> FC1/CL3.2->FC2/CL4.0.
>
> But "apt-get dist-upgrade" seems to work flawless for minor revision
> changes -- e.g., RHL9/CL3.1->FC1/CL3.2.
Wild. Since I haven't touched anything Red Hat since 4.something, it
seems truly strange to me that one can apt-get dist-upgrade RH. Even
though RH has this fine Debian ability, I will stick with my regular
Debian apt-get regalia.
I must be getting old in Linux years.
The Logan
-- 17:45:01 up 50 days, 19:57, 4 users, load average: 0.10, 0.17, 0.37 tar: Cowardly refusing to create an empty archive ICQ: 72101412 AIM/MSN/Yahoo/Jabber: logantheclever Registered Linux User: 277727
----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 17:27:29 EDT