Re: [SLUG] the golden rule of discussion can go to heck with ken elliott

• Next message: Bob Stia: "Re: [SLUG] Alsamixer"
• Previous message: Chad Perrin: "Re: [SLUG] subject change (was the golden rule)"
• In reply to: steve szmidt: "Re: [SLUG] the golden rule of discussion can go to heck with ken elliott"
• Next in thread: Ken Elliott: "RE: [SLUG] the golden rule of discussion can go to heck with ken elliott"
• Reply: Ken Elliott: "RE: [SLUG] the golden rule of discussion can go to heck with ken elliott"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

steve szmidt wrote:
> On Monday 29 November 2004 09:03 pm, Ken Elliott wrote:
>
>>OK, I've started a new thread.
>>
>>I've tired of Brian hogging the lime light...<grin>
>>
>>Ken Elliott
>>=====================
>
>
> What's up with all these attention grabbing emails? Are you lonely or looney?
>
> (Too Funny! : )

Darnation and heckfire, people. Have you no respect at all?

Ken Elliot wins a cookie for this one, by the way.

--
Chad
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS).  Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.

• Next message: Bob Stia: "Re: [SLUG] Alsamixer"
• Previous message: Chad Perrin: "Re: [SLUG] subject change (was the golden rule)"
• In reply to: steve szmidt: "Re: [SLUG] the golden rule of discussion can go to heck with ken elliott"
• Next in thread: Ken Elliott: "RE: [SLUG] the golden rule of discussion can go to heck with ken elliott"
• Reply: Ken Elliott: "RE: [SLUG] the golden rule of discussion can go to heck with ken elliott"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:45:15 EDT