On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 18:43, Chad Perrin wrote:
> I use WindowMaker as my favored window manager, by the way. I like the
> fact that it doesn't suffer the weighty bloat of Gnome and KDE, nor the
> cluttered interface. In fact, it's a less-cluttered interface than
> basically every other window manager that isn't on the level of FVWM in
> its lack (in my opinion) of smooth functionality. I don't know how it
> compares to IceWM, Blackbox, and XFCE in terms of resource usage and the
> like, but I don't favor those window managers' interfaces enough to make
> the switch at this time anyway.
What are your session and file managers then?
Window managers are only part of the equation. Granted, session and
file managers are optional, but some of us like the full trio.
If I just run a Window manager, and not with a session or file manager,
things tend to be quite smaller in footprint.
-- Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith@ieee.org -------------------------------------------------------------------- Subtotal Cost of Ownership (SCO) for Windows being less than Linux Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) assumes experts for the former, costly retraining for the latter, omitted "software assurance" costs in compatible desktop OS/apps for the former, no free/legacy reuse for latter, and no basic security, patch or downtime comparison at all.----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:18:32 EDT