On Tuesday 19 July 2005 21:05, Matthew Burke wrote:
> You can clearly see that it's different. Are there different v2.2
> devices? I have been using Hyper ever since I bricked my router using
> the shit Sveasoft firmware that was "guaranteed" to work on my device.
> I'm happy with the speed and signal quality I get with hyper, I'd just
> like to see sshd or snort in there as well (so that's why I'm playing
> with my device, trying to learn so I can hack it in myself)
>
> 404
I don't know about the v2.2 units, but I know that there are minor changes
within the v3.0 units, e.g. one of my v3.0's has resistor installed for the
JTAG header and on the other unit, purchased maybe 4 months later, the
resistors are not installed. The v3.0 processor ID that reads out on the
JTAG has a leading 2 instead of a 1 indicating a newer version even though
the markings on the chip package are identical. Hence, I would not be
surprised if there are differences in the v2.2 units.
There are more substantial changes between v1 and v2. I think the ethernet
chip is entirely different. The changes don't affect most hacking projects,
though.
I presume you got your unit unbricked.
Don
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:03:07 EDT