Re: [SLUG] threads trend (top vs. bottom replies.)

From: Thomas Ufer (tufer@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: Sat Aug 13 2005 - 19:21:55 EDT

Next message: Eben King: "Re: [SLUG] repartitioning"
Previous message: Robert Snyder: "Re: [SLUG] Anyone work for a Linux"
In reply to: patrick grantham: "[SLUG] threads trend (top vs. bottom replies.)"
Next in thread: Joe Brandt: "Re: [SLUG] threads trend (top vs. bottom replies.)"
Reply: Joe Brandt: "Re: [SLUG] threads trend (top vs. bottom replies.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 18:35 -0400, patrick grantham wrote:
> Threads on top when replying vs. threads on bottom. Lord have mercy, I hope
> a standard comes out. <snip>

I prefer the snip the extraneous stuff and post below.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.

Next message: Eben King: "Re: [SLUG] repartitioning"
Previous message: Robert Snyder: "Re: [SLUG] Anyone work for a Linux"
In reply to: patrick grantham: "[SLUG] threads trend (top vs. bottom replies.)"
Next in thread: Joe Brandt: "Re: [SLUG] threads trend (top vs. bottom replies.)"
Reply: Joe Brandt: "Re: [SLUG] threads trend (top vs. bottom replies.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:01:08 EDT