Re: [SLUG] threads trend (top vs. bottom replies.)

From: Eben King (eben1@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: Sun Aug 14 2005 - 09:27:30 EDT


On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Pete Theisen wrote:

> patrick grantham wrote:
> > Threads on top when replying vs. threads on bottom. Lord have mercy, I hope
> > a standard comes out. The war between replying on the top vs. bottom is
> > giving a headache. Both have merit, I just wish one would win.
>
> Hi Patrick!
>
> Well, if no one trims and then someone bottom posts at the bottom of all
> that untrimmed thread, well!

Likewise, s/bottom/top/ . Either one by itself is easily readable. A
combination? No.

-- 
-eben    ebQenW1@EtaRmpTabYayU.rIr.OcoPm    home.tampabay.rr.com/hactar
A: Because it looks dumb and is hard to read.
Q: Why is top-posting wrong?  -- from lots42@xxx.com
        http://www.fscked.co.uk/writing/top-posting-cuss.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:02:19 EDT