Re: [SLUG] threads trend (top vs. bottom replies.)

From: michael hast (evylrobot19@cox.net)
Date: Sun Aug 14 2005 - 11:44:01 EDT


steve szmidt wrote:

>On Saturday 13 August 2005 18:35, patrick grantham wrote:
>
>
>>Threads on top when replying vs. threads on bottom. Lord have mercy, I
>>hope a standard comes out. The war between replying on the top vs. bottom
>>is giving a headache. Both have merit, I just wish one would win.
>>
>>
>
>Well there is a standard. In the beginning... hehe, well it's true. In the
>beginning replies were actually done at the bottom of the post. Emails were
>easy to read.
>
>BTW, email programs are the ones that were set to automatically add the reply
>to the top or bottom. Intersecting replies were also made after each
>paragraph or statement when several issues were being discussed, but that was
>done manually.
>
>Microsoft were very late to "get" the Internet. When they did they tried to
>change the way everyone worked it. [Which is also standard for them. Adopt a
>standard and change it.] Anyway they had tried a couple of things to modify
>the way the Internet worked in an attempt to "take over". To make it a MS
>network basically. Fortunately they failed on all but adding great confusion
>with top posting.
>
>One of the things they did is to have their email programs automatically start
>replies at the top, rather than bottom. You know how prevalent windows became
>and with all these new users who did not know squat about how things were
>done. So they were automatically moved onto the MS way of top posting.
>
>Unfortunately/fortunately I don't expect that one will "win" as some people
>will never stop doing it their way. With companies like MS who only leave
>their own standards alone, I for one don't ever expect that to ever occur.
>
>
>
And that's exactly why I say bottom. I can follow a train of thought
backwards because I've got a twisted brain. Often it is easier to read
the most current slice of thread at the top of the page, but M$ is
trying to change the way we do everything. When you look at the history
of Linux and the GNU project, more than a clever alternative OS it's
like the people making a stand against the giant. In a way, it is the
world's first successful Socialist revolution. I don't want anyone
telling me what I should do or how to do it. This is why I
bottom-post. It's not about proper flow of thought or pooping, it is
about doing what I want in a society with assinine regulations. VIVA LA
GNU!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:02:38 EDT