Re: [SLUG] threads trend (top vs. bottom replies.)

From: Logan Tygart (thelogan@allyourbase-arebelongto.us)
Date: Mon Aug 15 2005 - 21:06:35 EDT


On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 18:19 -0400, Eric Jahn wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 18:10 -0400, Mike Branda wrote:
> > Well I would agree if the OT was more than 5 messages long and not
> > marked as such with a subject change. As of your post you were only
> > looking at 3 posts that deviated from the top vs bottom post subject.
> > I'd say relax a little... ;^)
> >
> > Is a 3 message break from the norm really that irritating??
>
> I was really referring to all to OT threads including the annual top vs.
> bottom thing. When it started forking from useless debate (your "norm")
> to just useless nothing, I had to say something. -Eric

It is only missing the obligatory netiquette link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting

You're welcome,

The Logan

-- 
21:05:01 up 71 days, 10:31, 4 users, load average: 0.39, 0.32, 0.28
"The human brain is like an enormous fish; it is flat and slimy and has gills through which it can see." -- Monty Python
ICQ: 72101412 AIM/MSN/Yahoo/Jabber: logantheclever
Registered Linux User: 277727


----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:07:30 EDT