Re: [SLUG] iptables question for p3scan on a transparent bridge

From: Daniel Schmidt (manofsloth@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Dec 26 2005 - 14:17:54 EST


Apparently I needed an ebtables rule too. Progress
marches on.

--- Daniel Schmidt <manofsloth@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> As the subject so subtly implies, I'm trying to set
> up
> a transparent bridge running p3scan->clamav and
> spamassassin. I'm using redwall, which is RH 9
> based.
> I have the bridge created and functional, and
> p3scan
> is listening on localhost:8110, but when I add the
> NAT
> rule with iptables I can't get through on 110. The
> command I'm using is iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING
> -p
> tcp --dport 110 -j REDIRECT --to-port 8110. I've
> also
> tried with "-i eth1" and "-i br0", but no luck. I'm
> pretty sure the problem is in iptables, because I
> get
> some feedback from p3scan in debug mode when I
> telnet
> to 8110, but nothing on localhost:110.
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
>
> __________________________________________
> Yahoo! DSL � Something to write home about.
> Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> dsl.yahoo.com
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This list is provided as an unmoderated internet
> service by Networked
> Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions
> expressed in messages
> posted are those of the author and do not
> necessarily reflect the
> official policy or position of NKS or any of its
> employees.
>

                
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:14:30 EDT