On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 10:07 -0500, Eben King wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Eben King wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Mike Branda wrote:
> >
> > > I'm going to do some looking into the BL/RBL thing and find out if the
> > > SuSE default setup comes with that stuff. Your analysis will hopefully
> > > guide you with any custom scoring if we don't come up with anything
> > > else...
> >
> > Update:
> >
> > I wrote a script (63 lines) to extract the raw counts for each test from two
> > groups of messages (I suggest "spam" and "not spam", but it's up to the
> > user.
>
> Since I posted that, I've received *no* spam that I can see. Not that I've
> received the usual amount but SA worked, zero pieces. This is troubling --
> not that I miss it, but I wonder if I messed something up and messages are
> going directly to the bit-bucket, do not pass Go. ~/.procmailrc still
> starts with
>
> :0fw: spamassassin.lock
> * < 256000
> | spamassassin
>
> (At the top it says "SpamAssassin sample procmailrc".) I'm still getting
> non-spam (at least, enough to make me not worry _too_ much). How can I
> verify that stuff still works the way it should?
>
Send yourself the GTUBE test message:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/
and see if it gets caught and dropped in your spam folder.
Alternatively, or if that doesn't show up anywhere, I'd bump up the
logging on SA and procmail.
HTH.
Mike Branda Jr.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:41:10 EDT