Re: [SLUG] hardware dependancies?

From: steve szmidt (
Date: Tue Jan 31 2006 - 12:28:36 EST

On Tuesday 31 January 2006 12:05, Jason Boxman wrote:
> I wonder what that makes you if you only embark on configuration
> adventures if you feel a new software package will increase your network's
> flexibility, reliability, redundancy, or featureset in the pursuit of some
> architectural change and not merely for the sake of installing said
> package and moving on to something else?

A nosy, no good, pain in the <bleep> troublemaker, soon to be ex-employee! :)

If you really are asking that in earnest, you would still be a sys or network
admin. You are what you do.


Steve Szmidt

"For evil to triumph all that is needed is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 17:21:50 EDT