Eben King wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Eben King wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Eben King wrote:
>>
>>> I set up and trained SA on my machine:
>>>
>>> eben@pc:~$ sa-learn --backup | head
>>> v 3 db_version # this must be the first line!!!
>>> v 386 num_spam
>>> v 942 num_nonspam
>>>
>>> But it seems not to scan some messages, which I don't understand.
>>
>>
>> OK, it looks like Postfix passes most (all?) mail through procmail,
>> but somehow SA isn't putting its mark on them. I sent myself a test
>> message, and saw this in /var/log/syslog:
>>
>> Jun 16 19:22:05 pc postfix/local[4329]: 1C04210609:
>> to=<eben@localhost>, relay=local, delay=0, status=sent (delivered to
>> command: /usr/bin/procmail)
>>
>> but the message has no X-Spam headers. Hmm. Does procmail have a
>> config file that can be hosed interestingly?
I personaly like the deamonized spamd\spamc version of spamassassin.
It's more efficient and scales better. Personaly I like the integration
better than the procmail way. I bet you already have it :)
It's faily straightforward to get postfix to use it.
Here is a how too in in case you are interested:
http://www.akadia.com/services/postfix_spamassassin.html
-Chris
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:11:01 EDT