Re: [SLUG] Is RAID worth doing?

From: Jason Boxman (jasonb@edseek.com)
Date: Sun Jul 16 2006 - 14:09:16 EDT


On Sunday 16 July 2006 13:57, steve szmidt wrote:
<snip>
> But looking a bit deeper after Ian's comment I've discovered that it does
> not have any cache, which makes a big difference. It's also performing
> mostly at the bottom compared with other good SATA & SCSI RAID cards.

Which ones? SCSI and SAS solutions are another ballgame in any case.

> Actually even the builtin mb SATA interface is a tad faster.

Tested how? What RAID level? What drives? Which cards?

-- 

Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 14:41:17 EDT