RE: [SLUG] Splitting Cat 6 cable

From: Ken Elliott (kelliott11@cfl.rr.com)
Date: Wed Oct 18 2006 - 18:17:39 EDT


If I understand, you have the cable modem, hub, XP desktop, Vonage router
and phones at one end of the 100' cable. At the other end, you have the BSD
laptop, switch and a printer. The only reason you need two circuits is you
want to use the BSD laptop as the router. Sound like you could:
1 - Move the BSD box to the other end (next to the cable modem)
2 = Get a hardware router, and install it next to the cable modem.

Either of these sound like they might be a better solution.

Ken Elliott

=====================
-----Original Message-----
From: slug@nks.net [mailto:slug@nks.net] On Behalf Of Jan Mason
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:51 AM
To: slug@nks.net
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Splitting Cat 6 cable

The cable is a Mohawk M56889 Cat 6, 4 pair, 24awg solid utp cable.

"Why can't you run two parallel cables in the conduit?"
Its an external cable run in the condo and I agreed with the one cable
argument.

When complete, my preferred configuration would look as follows:
cable modem <-> 100 foot cable <->
dedicated router/firewall OpenBSD 4.0 laptop <->
switch <-> fedora core 5 laptop
          <-> hp lj 4000 printer
          <-> 100 foot cable <-> hub <-> win xp desktop
                                                 <-> vonage router <->
phones
Backup plan:
cable modem <-> dedicated router/firewall OpenBSD 4.0 laptop <->
switch <-> win xp desktop
          <-> vonage router <-> phones
          <-> 100 foot cable <-> hub <-> fedora core 5 laptop
                                                <-> hp lj 4000 printer

It sounds like I might need to go with my backup plan.

Lan Shack sells a Cat 5E network splitter:
http://www.lanshack.com/Network-Splitter-Pair-P47C56.aspx
Splits one 4 pair category 5 (or 5E) cable into two Network
connections. Works with 100Base-T Ethernet, 10Base-T, or any
connection that utilizes pins 1, 2, 3 & 6.

On 10/18/06, Eben King <eben01@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Jan Mason wrote:
>
> > I am setting up a new fast Ethernet network that has one 100 foot
> > cable in it. I went with Cat 6 cables, Cat 6 plugs, and Cat 6 jacks.
> > I want to connect two jacks at either end of the 100 foot cable. Two
> > pairs to each jack. The jacks are going into surface mount boxes.
> >
> > Will there be a performance hit running two data circuits through one
> > cable? If there is a hit, do you think that I will still have full
> > performance for a fast Ethernet network?
> >
> > Thanks for your support.
>
> I'm going to guess "if the connections try to transmit or listen at the
same
> time there will be increased interference". Some Ethernet cables only
have
> two pairs in them, so you obviously couldn't use those. Also, since this
> cable will otherwise be identical to any other cable, make sure you mark
it
> somehow so it's clear it's different. If you can hijack some ancient
> computers, you might run some sort of router software to do that safely.
> Why can't you run two parallel cables in the conduit?
>
> --
> -eben QebWenE01R@vTerYizUonI.nOetP royalty.no-ip.org:81
> TAURUS: You will never find true happiness - what you gonna
> do, cry about it? The stars predict tomorrow you'll wake up,
> do a bunch of stuff and then go back to sleep. -- Weird Al
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
> Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
> posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
> official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.

-- 
Jan Mason
Registered Linux User #156002
jan.mason@gmail.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS).  Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.

----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:08:57 EDT