On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Mike Branda wrote:
> Ian C. Blenke wrote:
>> Mike Branda wrote:
>>
>>> Have you ever had to use xfs_check or xfs_repair? How good are they? XFS
>>> formats out with the same 932GB as Reiserfs so that's good. I know Apple
>>> uses a version of XFS but I haven't had any experience with JFS. Any
>>> reason to use it over XFS?
>>
>> Yes. I've used xfs_repair numerous times, and I've really had great success
>> with it.
>>
>> Apple doesn't have a version of XFS that I'm aware of, they _do_ have ZFS
>> in the Leopard betas (10.5) which might be out soon.
>
> Sorry, I was confusing HFS with XFS. My Bad.
Make sure you don't confuse HFS.Apple with HFS.SGI (or was it HFS.HP?).
AFAIK, neither HFS nor HFS+ (from Apple) is case-sensitive, and OSX breaks
in interesting ways if you use a filesystem that is.
-- -eben QebWenE01R@vTerYizUonI.nOetP http://royalty.mine.nu:81 An ASCII character walks into a bar and orders a double. "Having a bad day?" asks the barman. "Yeah, I have a parity error," replies the ASCII chrcter. The barman says, "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off." - Skud ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:27:28 EDT