Hmm. Try mounting the next DVD you need like this:
mount -t udf,iso9660 <your normal options>
Also... I wonder if the udf module is getting loaded on demand properly?
Check your dmesg and lsmod after you try mounting, see if you notice
anything odd.
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 02:49 -0500, Eben King wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Paul Bransford wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 02:03 -0500, Eben King wrote:
> >> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Eben King wrote:
> >>
> >>> I rebuilt my kernel (several times, until I got it mostly right), and now
> >>> Thunar (xfce's file manager) doesn't see CDs/DVDs. It sees USB flash (thumb)
> >>> drives, so it kinda works. Plus I can mount and read CDs/DVDs by other
> >>> means, so it's not as if I forgot to build some CD support module. Any clues?
> >>
> >> I take that back, it works on some discs. The successes are a mix of burned
> >> and pressed, but always are reported by "file" to be:
> >>
> >> ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data UDF filesystem data (unknown version, id 'NSR0
> >>
> >> When that disc is mounted, "mount" says:
> >>
> >> /dev/hda on /media/CDROM type iso9660
> >>
> >> and /proc/filesystems contains iso9660 but not udf (no doubt they're
> >> configured as modules). For the failures, "file - < /dev/hda" says "data".
> >> I haven't figured out the pattern yet.
>
> > Looks like you missed UDF. That's the (normal) file system for DVDs...
> > it can handle much larger (<4gb) files than vanilla ISO9660.
>
> Got that and Joliet both:
>
> <M> ISO 9660 CDROM file system support
> [*] Microsoft Joliet CDROM extensions
> [*] Transparent decompression extension
> <M> UDF file system support
>
> I've only made a few DVDs using UDF. Usually I use iso9660, like this
> one here:
>
> eben@pc:~$ mount | grep CDROM
> /dev/hda on /media/CDROM type iso9660 (ro,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=hal,utf8,uid=1000)
>
> eben@pc:~$ df -h /media/CDROM
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda 3.0G 3.0G 0 100% /media/CDROM
>
> For some reason it's rejecting a bunch though.
>
> > You'll also want the Rock-Ridge extensions if that's still an option.
>
> Don't see it, must be considered to be too "standard" to warrant standing
> alone.
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 17:41:29 EDT