On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Pete Theisen wrote:
> I just got an ominous email from verizon, something about not charging me
> for an early termination if my plan is terminated by them, but they didn't
> elaborate.
I got one too. Mine had the amusing characteristic:
,--
| Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:17:40 -0600 (CST)
...
| Subject: Effective November 30,
(etc)
'--
So it's retroactive. Is that even legal?
> I tried to reply but the mailbox didn't accept it.
>
> What's up?
I'm guessing they yanked someone's service, had the unmitigated gall to
demand that the person pay an Early Termination Fee, got sued, lost, and
this is the result. Sounds like if you violate your TOS badly enough to
get kicked out of the pool, they don't try to bill you for it. Good thing,
that.
-- A well-lovd and corrctly traind domstc cnine is gnrlly slobbry, excitbl, noisy, scatologically obsessed, xenophobic, pathetically unjudgmental, embrrssngly uninhbtd, unreasnngly dvtd, hrtbrkngly dpndnt and wretchedly craven. All othr knds of dog cmpre unfvrbly wth ths picture. - PB, AFCA ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 14:12:58 EDT