Re: [SLUG-POL] The lunatic state of california

From: Isaiah Weiner (iweiner@redhat.com)
Date: Fri Jun 15 2001 - 03:37:37 EDT

Next message: Steven Johnson: "Re: [SLUG-POL] The lunatic state of california"
Previous message: Isaiah Weiner: "Re: [SLUG-POL] The lunatic state of california"
In reply to: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] The lunatic state of california"
Next in thread: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] The lunatic state of california"
Reply: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] The lunatic state of california"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 03:07:23AM -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:
> Yes, with a new list host came the omission of vulgar.pl. So curse away
> if it makes you happy. Though my preference is for reasoned non-profane
> discussion, rather than raw pornographic flamage.

What an interesting misuse of the word pornographic. Lewd, _perhaps_
but lascivious? Certainly not.

-- 
    - Isaiah

Next message: Steven Johnson: "Re: [SLUG-POL] The lunatic state of california"
Previous message: Isaiah Weiner: "Re: [SLUG-POL] The lunatic state of california"
In reply to: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] The lunatic state of california"
Next in thread: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] The lunatic state of california"
Reply: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] The lunatic state of california"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:11:24 EDT