Fair enough. Point favorably taken.
Smitty
On Thursday 19 July 2001 09:52, you wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Smitty wrote:
> > > > Assumed identities are not identical.
> > >
> > > And what identity would you be assuming today?
> >
> > Identitiy as I used it was in the sense of equivalence or
> > same, not in the sense you have, although it is a rather
> > clever pun. You are being punny. :·)
>
> .... That's more cheerful. The 'misunderstanding' pun was
> intentional. -- me as the jester having a kooky antic, so to
> speak.
>
> Seriously, I _do_ try to raise the care of composition, and
> logical rather than emotional volume of flamefests --
>
> While there is 'all fight - no rules' here, to avoid
> re-hashing and stirring the same old pot, it just seems fair
> avoid _initiating_ ad hominem's (sort of a Goodwin's Rule); to
> inject levity with argument, and at the end of the thread,
> stop off for a virtual beer together [to get ready for the
> next round <g>].
>
> -- Cheers,
>
> Russ
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:27:01 EDT