Jason Copenhaver wrote:
> many people beleive that 2.4.xx should have stayed at 2.3.xx for a bit
> longer.. not only that.. changes have been made in 2.4.xx that most people
> think should have waited until 2.5.xx ( a complete VM rewrite in 2.4.10)
> give 2.4.xx some more time and it'll settle down.. hopefully more so once
> 2.5.xx starts up..
Same thing was said about various patches and backports from 2.3 to
2.2. At some point, some things go in, others don't.
SGI's XFS won't be in the kernel until 2.6 (or 3.0, whatever they
call it), but many of us think XFS on 2.4 is more stable than
Ext2/Ext3 on 2.4.
-- TheBS
-- Bryan "TheBS" Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org chat:thebs413 Engineer AbsoluteValue Systems, Inc. http://www.linux-wlan.org President SmithConcepts, Inc. http://www.SmithConcepts.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ Those living in the US who consider the American flag to be a sym- bol of oppression obviously fail to understand what the word means
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 15:09:17 EDT