Re: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?

• Next message: Bill: "Re: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?"
• Previous message: Robin Miller: "Re: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?"
• In reply to: Robin Miller: "[SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?"
• Next in thread: Robert Haeckl: "Re: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I happen to like a lot of what is there now. I would like to see more
indepth coverage of specific software for linux. Say several articles on
some of the major programs like the GIMP, or Evolution, Apache, etc. not
a one part good article, or 2 quick ones, say one each week for a month
on apache and linux. This is linux.COM not .ORG it should be aimed at
more business and regular people, not developers.

-Seth
 
On Sat, 2001-10-27 at 10:04, Robin Miller wrote:
> If you had a chance to decide what should and should not be on
> Linux.com, what would you include? What would you leave out?
>
> - Robin "Roblimo" Miller
> Editor in Chief, OSDN
>

• Next message: Bill: "Re: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?"
• Previous message: Robin Miller: "Re: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?"
• In reply to: Robin Miller: "[SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?"
• Next in thread: Robert Haeckl: "Re: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 15:55:51 EDT