On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:25:13AM -0400, Matt Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 18:55, Paul M Foster wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:00:26AM -0400, Timothy wrote:
> >
> > > Steven;
> > >
> > > I know I'm taking the risk of being accused of trolling BUT IMHO Red
> > > Hat has gone the way of Mickey$oft. First, the emphasis on GUI's and
> > > the denigration of the command line configuration.
> >
> > Welcome to the world of computers in the 21st century. Red Hat's not
> > alone in this. Even Debian is using a GUI install these days, from what
> > I hear.
>
> Untrue. Debian's install is still as unappealing as ever -- it's a
> curses like menu install, a far cry from Red Hat, Mandrake or Suse's GUI
> installers.
I'm talking about the next version of Debian, due out Real Soon Now
(tm). From what I understand, they're borrowing code from Progeny for
their installer. I could be wrong, but it seems like that's what I've
heard.
> Most people are dissuaded from Debian for this reason alone -- the
> installer lacks any autodetect features like other Linux distros and
> assumes the user has a decent knowledge of the system's hardware when
> installing. Too bad, since apt-get, dpkg, and dselect are by far (IMHO)
> the best package management tools for any of the available distros.
>
I don't know if the autodetect stuff is true in the upcoming version of
Debian. However, I agree that the Debian install of the past is not for
the faint of heart or the newbie. I reserve judgment on their install
until I see the next version come out. In fact, though I love Debian, I
reserve judgment on the whole distro until I see them speed up their
upgrade cycle. 1-1/2 to 2 years between major releases is _far_ too
long.
Paul
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:39:56 EDT