> This has been discussed before, and the NKS people have spent some time
> working on the server this list is hosted on. There appears to have
> been some improvement, but I have to make one point. This list is a
Since the topic has come up again, I feel that I must apologize to the
server admins. I have readily pointed out a few times in the past that
the list had a very slow turnaround time. However, I didn't say a thing
when the issue was examined and solved, at least for the majority of posts
(all of the ones I've looked into.) For example, here's a few headers
from the post I'm responding to:
Received: from bart.nks.net (bart.nks.net [::ffff:66.152.21.164])
by mail.coffeehouseltd.com with esmtp; Mon, 01 Jul 2002 19:17:16 -0400
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
by bart.nks.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id TAA05195
for slug-track29; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 19:06:23 -0400
Just under 11 minutes is a marked improvement from the 45 mins to over an
hour I was seeing previously, not to mention being completely normal for a
mailing list of any size. I say kudos to the NKS folks, not only for
fixing the problem, but for providing the service to the community in the
first place. I can't speak for anyone else, but from me - Thank you...
-Ken
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 13:27:25 EDT