Well
I must admit I'm not sure which direction to go on this one. I like a
little glitz, but I also hate the sites that are just overloaded with
snap crackle and pop!
Where does one draw the line?
Russ
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 08:15, Ronan Heffernan wrote:
>
> > People get all excited about glitz. Forget it. Flaming logos and such
> > aren't needed. A website is about information. They either want your
> > information or they don't. Glitz doesn't matter. Yes, you want to make
> > it attractive, but it doesn't have to be flashy to be attractive. Good
> > organization and readability is more important than glitz. You're doing
> > fine so far.
> >
> > Paul
>
>
> Paul,
> You are thinking like an engineer (me too!) Most people care at
> least as much about the form as the content (witness AOL). Superior
> information, presented in a clear, organized fashion, might draw fewer
> hits and less participation (among non-engineers) than some
> heavily-themed eye candy. Sad but true.
>
> --ronan
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:54:18 EDT