Re: [SLUG] XF86Config issues

From: Levi Bard (levi@bard.sytes.net)
Date: Mon Dec 02 2002 - 11:43:45 EST

Next message: Matt: "Re: [SLUG] Introduction"
Previous message: Scott@itcgroup.co.uk: "[SLUG] Introduction"
In reply to: Mario Lombardo: "Re: [SLUG] XF86Config issues"
Next in thread: Mario Lombardo: "Re: [SLUG] XF86Config issues"
Reply: Mario Lombardo: "Re: [SLUG] XF86Config issues"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Do you think
> it's RedHat's desire to avoid xf86config and use Xconfigurator
> exclusively?

Actually, it is Redhat's desire for its users to use Xconfigurator exclusively, probably because they develop it themselves. It seems odd that the usbutils and hotplug packages would require Xconfigurator at all, let alone an obsolete version. Sounds like questionable packaging to me.

Levi

Next message: Matt: "Re: [SLUG] Introduction"
Previous message: Scott@itcgroup.co.uk: "[SLUG] Introduction"
In reply to: Mario Lombardo: "Re: [SLUG] XF86Config issues"
Next in thread: Mario Lombardo: "Re: [SLUG] XF86Config issues"
Reply: Mario Lombardo: "Re: [SLUG] XF86Config issues"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:20:15 EDT