I sent an email to Bynari concerning this thread as I have looked at their
product before. Their response was within an hour from the time I sent the
email:
We appreciate your information and concern for the well being of
Bynari. If you could forward to those groups to contact me directly
for any issues with Bynari, I would appreciate it.
We have had many changes in the past few months, but we have a stable
product with a good support staff, willing to assist anyone that
communicates with us.
If there is anything that I can do for you, please let me know.
Regards,
Richard Nelon
Director of Sales
214-350-5772 x37
richard@bynari.net
Bynari, Inc.
[jbgrant01@hotmail.com - Fri Dec 6 10:40:08 2002]:
> For your information,
>
> On a recent exchange in a linux user group mailing list the thread
was
> about replacement options for Win NT/ Exchange 5.5. The most
> forceful comment was "Forget Bynari - they do not return phone
> calls and users cannot contact technical support".
>
> I recognize the demand for a replacement probably is creating more
> demand than you may have ramped up for intitially. I just thought
> you might want to know.
>
> Jim Grant
> 727.942.1571
> Cell 727.534.4485
----- Original Message -----
From: "robin" <robin@roblimo.com>
To: <slug@nks.net>
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] OpenSource replacement for Exchange Server that will w
ork with Outlook
> Doug Koobs wrote:
> > Thanks, I'll check it out. Why is Bynari no longer a viable option?
>
>
> I need to do more research, but suffice it to say several people I know
> and highly respect who were flirting with Bynari as a potential
> replacement for Groupwise in their 800+ user environment got tired of
> trying to reach Bynari support people to help with their small-group
> beta test.
>
> Another tipoff of an unhealthy company: Here I am, writing articles
> about Exchange replacements. You'd think Bynari would be eager to return
> my calls and make sure I write a favorable article about their product.
> But I find it impossible to get through to them.
>
> This is generally a very bad sign.
>
> - Robin
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:43:30 EDT