Re: [SLUG] St. Pete Meeting Follow Up

From: Aaron Steimle (asteimle@washpat.com)
Date: Tue Dec 31 2002 - 13:31:59 EST


I think what may have happened is that he had a install that went bad and
that's where everything was ended up...hence it wouldn't work. I think for
the next meeting I might go over the what the directorys mean...maybe even
have some handouts.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Smitty" <a.smitty@verizon.net>
To: <slug@nks.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] St. Pete Meeting Follow Up

> On Tuesday 31 December 2002 09:41, you wrote:
> > I would first like to apologize to Smitty for not having enough time to
> > keep working your computer. I hated to leave you in that state.
>
> No problem, Aaron. By the way, I hope we answered all of the "questions"
> subtly calculated to invalidate linux put forth by the middle-aged
microsoft
> shill who showed up. Amazing how he repeatedly insisted that /etc
contains
> executable files. I guess he can only think in terms of how ms does
things.
>
> >
> > Here is the link to the IP Masquerading website http://ipmasq.cjb.net/ .
> > Just remember that you may have to use dos2unix on the firewall script.
> >
> > Also, did anyone have any question about the Lindows box? I know we
didn't
> > get to spend to much time with it.
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:58:04 EDT