Re: [SLUG] Unix code disclaimer, and this SCO debacle

From: Andrew M Hoerter (amh@pobox.com)
Date: Tue Jun 17 2003 - 22:06:39 EDT

Next message: Dave Lowe: "Re: [SLUG] Second try with Enigmail"
Previous message: jeff: "Re: [SLUG] Unix code disclaimer, and this SCO debacle"
In reply to: jeff: "Re: [SLUG] Unix code disclaimer, and this SCO debacle"
Next in thread: Levi Bard: "RE: [SLUG] Unix code disclaimer, and this SCO debacle"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, jeff wrote:

> MS has an ace up their sleeve on that one anyways. To find the code
> would mean that you have disassembled/reverse engineered *their* code,
> which is against the license agreement.

Not to mention, potentially, the DMCA.

Bad laws, you're soaking in them.

Next message: Dave Lowe: "Re: [SLUG] Second try with Enigmail"
Previous message: jeff: "Re: [SLUG] Unix code disclaimer, and this SCO debacle"
In reply to: jeff: "Re: [SLUG] Unix code disclaimer, and this SCO debacle"
Next in thread: Levi Bard: "RE: [SLUG] Unix code disclaimer, and this SCO debacle"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:53:07 EDT