Re: [SLUG] Dreamweaver-like software

From: Bill Canaday (bill13510@wwnet.net)
Date: Sat Feb 28 2004 - 23:17:46 EST


On Saturday 28 February 2004 07:08 pm, you wrote:

> As far as recommending something better... I did... Quanta Plus :)
>
> IMHO Quanta Plus is much better then Quanta Gold.
>
> -- Rob

I'm already using 3.1.4. The folks at Quanta are not consistent with their
labeling of it. In one place it shows Quanta Plus, another Quanta+ or even
just an unadorned Quanta. I suspect, though, that we are talking about the
same piece of software. Solid work.

Are you using the bleeding edge (quanta_be_01.tar.bz2) release? I notice in
the release notes for the "be" release that there is some sort of support for
Dreamweaver templates.

Linux is blessed with at least 3 good web specific editors, Bluefish, Quanta
(various releases) and Screem. I don't know how any of them stack up against
Dreamweaver ... but all of them are good enough for everything I do.

Bill

-- 
http://cannaday.us (genealogy)
http://organic-earth.com (organic gardening)
Uptimes below for the machines that created / host these sites.
 22:29:00  up 53 days, 23:12,  6 users,  load average: 0.33, 0.40, 0.33
 22:25:00  up 55 days,  2:37,  9 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:19:41 EDT