Robert Snyder wrote:
> Well after playing around with the demos for all the major Commerical
> Windows Xservers... ended up picking up eXceed for just over 60
> dollars under an educational licence. While it feels the fastest
> out of them all. I need to figure out where I am having a bottleneck.
>
[snip]
> Now I trying to figure out where my bottle net could be.
> I tried putting in more ram into the server and even though i have the
> correct ram ( speed and timing ratio) the board is just plan old
> picky SOB....
> Or is it just too much info getting pushed through limited pipes of 802.11b
> Or something else I am just not thinking about.
> Faster host processor can take her up to 933
The problem is likely the X protocol itself. Though it was designed with
the network in mind, it's not at all efficient when it comes to
redrawinr or sending events. Move the mouse and you'll likely generate
hundreds of messages. Click on a button and dozens more get sent.
On the network level you can try things like tweaking the nagle
settings, tuning the packet size, etc.. On the application level try
compressing the channel and decreasing the events sent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 15:37:58 EDT