[SLUG] Re: Fedora Core 2 Install from HD Problem -- Slackers

From: Bryan J. Smith (b.j.smith@ieee.org)
Date: Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:26:40 EDT


On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 02:32, jeff wrote:
> Nope, it at least would require an external cd drive,
> like a Backpacker or similar.

Which will have the same CD boot issues, back to the original problem.

> Looks like NFS

Which still requires you to boot somehow, back to the original problem.

> or the "stick the drive in another machine" methods are all that would
> have worked in that case.

The only, remaining option.

> Slackware had a method that could get around that obstacle.

Red Hat Linux/Fedora Core had several prior to kernel 2.6 as well. The
problem is the size of the 2.6 kernel.

> You could install zipslack to a zip drive which gives a pretty minimal install.

The 90MB "minimal" Fedora Core 2 install, as well as the 75MB "rescue"
image, is designed for Zips or other media, using UP2DATE, YUM or APT to
fetch packages.

The other Fedora Core 2 option is the 6MB "diskboot" image that is a FAT
image (all 8.3 filenames) one can plop onto anything that can boot (Zip,
USB, etc...). But gone is the floppy in Fedora Core 2 out of sheer
kernel 2.6 size limitations. Most other distros have done the same (if
they even offered a floppy boot in recent versions anyway).

> From there you could copy that to an ext2 partition (or a FAT partition),
> run setup from there and choose whatever else that you wished and
> install by ftp.

In Fedora Core, once LOADLIN gets the kernel up, anything goes for the
Anaconda installer. So I've used the 6MB "diskboot" to a HD several
times now. Fedora Core 2 is now getting better, but the kernel 2.6 size
is making it difficult to rotate a floppy into the equation.

But I'll admit that Slack has a far better, legacy-friendly/
low-footprint installer. And it's ability to install under DOS, with
8.3 filenames for its installer, is unparalleled. I was a total Slacker
from 1994-1996, but once I learned how to build RPMs, I became a Red Hat
bigot.

Today I prefer to deploy either Debian or Fedora-based distributions.
But I still find the occassional use for Gentoo and Slackware.

> I used to have a copy of bigslack (same thing with X installed also)
> that I passed on to people that were interested in trying Linux. Since
> it would install on a FAT partition, they didn't need to repartition
> their drive just for a test drive of Linux. But the live cd's have
> made that approach obsolete now.

Yeah, live CDs have made UMSFAT (was that the acronym?) pretty much
obsolete. I remember using it with Yggdrasil GLX back in 1993.

-- 
Bryan J. Smith                                  b.j.smith@ieee.org 
------------------------------------------------------------------ 
"Communities don't have rights. Only individuals in the community
 have rights. ... That idea of community rights is firmly rooted
 in the 'Communist Manifesto.'" -- Michael Badnarik

----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:45:21 EDT