Re: [SLUG] Re: AT&T Testing Linux as Windows Replacement

From: Logan Tygart (thelogan@allyourbase-arebelongto.us)
Date: Tue Oct 05 2004 - 19:22:25 EDT


On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 18:24, Steven Buehler wrote:
> --- "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@ieee.org> wrote:
<snip>
> > 2) I didn't know Microsoft had _any_ products in the high-end server
> > market?
>
> Does Windows Server 2003 ring a bell?
Not sure which smart aleck remark to use so you can have a choice:

1. No, but it sets off alarms.

2. Isn't that a 32 bit virus cured by installing Linux?

The Logan

-- 
19:20:01 up 8 days, 20:35, 3 users, load average: 0.40, 0.25, 0.26
Its not rocket surgery. -- Eggo Commercial
ICQ: 72101412 AIM/MSN/Yahoo/Jabber: logantheclever
Registered Linux User: 277727


----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:11:44 EDT