[SLUG] Re: AutoCAD Clone for Linux - IntelliCAD now in beta

From: Bryan J. Smith (b.j.smith@ieee.org)
Date: Sun Nov 28 2004 - 11:29:35 EST


On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 10:04, Ken Elliott wrote:
> All you AutoCAD guys might want to check this out. IntelliCAD is a low-cost
> AutoCAD clone that reads/writes DWG and builds upon your AutoCAD knowledge.
> http://www.bricscad.com/news/BricsCad%20goes%20Linux%20English.htm

IntelliCAD is a consortium of licensees now:
  http://www.intellicad.org

For those that didn't know of IntelliCAD prior, it was started by 3 (was
it?) former AutoDesk guys who didn't have any NDA or other agreement
that prevented them from building a clone. So they basically built a
$500 AutoCAD clone that read DWG _directly_ and did _full_ 2D/3D.

Visio bought them out, then Microsoft bought out Visio, and then
IntelliCAD was quashed as a product. Not coincidentally, AutoCAD
dropped AutoLisp and adopted VBScript, and became Win32-only shortly
afterwards. Now IntelliCAD is largely sold for a flat licensing fee.

BricsCAD ( http://www.bricscad.com/ ) is one of them. They make their
release 100% WINE (run-time) compatible, including full OpenGL support.
I've been running their betas since April -- excellent performance on
nVidia cards. I can't tell if I'm running under native Win32 or WINE
(originally had a GeForce4 Ti4200 128MB, now have a GeForce 6800GT
256MB).

How long Microsoft will continue to allow a licensee to make their
product WINE compatible, I don't know. I assume they can't do much,
unless it becomes really popular. BricsCAD says they are working on a
native port via WINELIB, but I have to believe Microsoft would yank
their license if they did that. The WINE run-time version seems to work
perfectly for me with any stock WINE build for Fedora, so I don't see
much reason for a WINELIB port (given the possible loss of license).

-- 
Bryan J. Smith                                    b.j.smith@ieee.org 
-------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Subtotal Cost of Ownership (SCO) for Windows being less than Linux
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) assumes experts for the former, costly
retraining for the latter, omitted "software assurance" costs in 
compatible desktop OS/apps for the former, no free/legacy reuse for
latter, and no basic security, patch or downtime comparison at all.

----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:33:15 EDT