Re: [SLUG] Video cards again again again...

From: michael hast (evylrobot19@cox.net)
Date: Sun Jan 08 2006 - 21:28:57 EST


michael hast wrote:

> Now that I'm getting down to some serious price comparisons on video
> cards (just about settled on Nvidia, although I've enjoyed ATI until
> now), I've noticed that a lot of the multiple-output cards have
> maximum res. that heeds questioning. For instance, the eVGA FX5500,
> says that it is capable of 2048x1536x32bitsx60Hz max. in analog.
> 1600x1200 digital. I plan on running two 21" CRT's on this bad boy at
> 1600x1200 each. Is this going to do it for me, or do I need something
> with more power? I suppose that the question is: Is the rating per
> channel, or cumulative? Plus, 2048x1536=3,145,728 (advertized max.) <
> 1600x1200(eacn monitor)x2(monitors)=3,840,000. Does that mean that it
> wouldn't work, or am I way off in left field on my rationalization?
>
Okay...

I expected something from that, even if it was ridicule. I noticed that
of the MoBo's that come with PCI-E slots, many have two 16x slots.
Might I be better off to get one of these with two, lower powered PCI-E
cards? I understand that it's not difficult to configure a dual-head
card (although I haven't ever done it), but how does it complicate
things to do two cards? See, this is why I didn't buy anything before
doing my homework.

-- 
--Michael Hast  (the evyl robot)
"Fire is clean, fire is bright"  --Ray Bradbury, Ferinheight 451
"Fire is clean, fire is bright, bitchin' and devine" --The Toadies, Rubberneck

----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:14:23 EDT