Re: [SLUG] OT: OpenSalarus

From: Levi Bard (taktaktaktaktaktaktaktaktaktak@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Mar 01 2006 - 09:58:47 EST


> <snip>
> > Since we had a working C compiler, we decided to install Galeon,
> > Tosha's browser of choice. This required us to get much newer
> > versions of the GTK+ libraries than the ones that had been installed.
> > After chasing down all the requisites (glib, atk, pango, ...), we
> > began compiling them. Unfortunately, no matter what we did, we were
> > unable to get the GTK+ configure script to see that pango was
> > installed, even by passing it the path. While it was perhaps not
> > Solaris's fault that we couldn't build GTK+, the fact that there was
> > only a poor selection of ancient software available for install
> > certainly was, and this was the last straw for us. For crying out
> > loud, we could have installed Slackware 8 and had the same currency of
> > software, except it would have worked out of the box without a lot of
> > futzing. We never got around to actually looking at or building the
> > actual OpenSolaris source, because we were hoping for a usable system
> > first. If you've actually read down this far, go get yourself a
> > cookie; you've earned it.
>
> If you were using gcc to compile, you'll notice it'll link stuff that may not
> be found at runtime. Solaris has a pretty basic list of runtime stuff
> available. You might want to try `crle` (I think) and add stuff
> like /usr/local/lib and maybe /opt/lib to your runtime linker path for stuff
> installed from SFW. (Make sure you include /lib and /usr/lib first, as if
> you don't include them in the list of paths you'll end up stuff not
> finding /lib and /usr/lib...)

Yeah, we actually found instructions for setting up the paths and
everything for gcc, and we were able to build and install several of
the libs. configure for the package that failed would see pango
version whatever; there was some particular extension that it wanted,
and after going back to pango and checking that we'd built it (and
rebuilding/reinstalling just in case), the the build system still
wouldn't use it. There was some alternative, but I forget what it was
now and in any case, it didn't work either. This isn't really a
problem with Solaris per se, but had it had a decent selection of
software, or at least recentish libraries, we wouldn't have had to
deal with it.

--
Debianista!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:25:59 EDT